English summary

Which asylum accounts hold up in court

Every published ruling with a substantive asylum account is classified into the story type the claim rests on. The table below shows how far each type deviates from the overall rate at which Dutch courts uphold the immigration service's decision.
Overall upheld rate
67.0%
Story types
10
Classified rulings
5,153
Language of sources
Dutch
01Deviation

Sorted by absolute deviation from the average

Story typeRulingsJudgedUpheldDeviation
Religious conversion67065448.6%-18.4 pt
Blood feud or honour killing69668778.5%+11.5 pt
Document fraud828072.5%+5.5 pt
LGBTI orientation1,0971,07172.5%+5.5 pt
Draft evasion13913272.0%+5.0 pt
Concealed origin36735771.1%+4.1 pt
Political activity1,2541,21963.2%-3.8 pt
Medical grounds12512163.6%-3.4 pt
Military service21220070.0%+3.0 pt
Family ties51149567.5%+0.5 pt

BronDutch judiciary open data (rechtspraak.nl). "Upheld" is the share of judged cases in which the court left the immigration service's decision intact; partial and unclear outcomes are excluded from the denominator.

02Caveats

How to read a deviation

A low upheld rate does not mean an account is untrue. It means the court more often found the decision insufficiently reasoned or otherwise unlawful for that type of case. Small denominators move sharply; the Dutch pages show a Wilson confidence interval per archetype.

Selection matters twice: only contested decisions are litigated, and only a part of the rulings is published.

Source language
Court rulings, quoted passages and case summaries are in Dutch, as published by the Dutch judiciary. These English pages summarise the figures and the method. The full detail lives on the Dutch patterns page (in Dutch).